<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Writers Need to Strike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/</link>
	<description>Some paint in oils, some in acrylics, I paint in badgers and midget ass</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WhoreChurch</title>
		<link>http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>WhoreChurch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 06:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>RJL,

I hope you weren't offended.  You just aren't smiling in the pic and you look very serious.  As in "one serious dude."  As in "don't mess with me, I'm a mommy and I have a whole bucket full of 'time out' with your name on it."  As in "people have scammed me before and you mess with me sucka I'm goin' to take you out."

Please don't hurt me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RJL,</p>
<p>I hope you weren&#8217;t offended.  You just aren&#8217;t smiling in the pic and you look very serious.  As in &#8220;one serious dude.&#8221;  As in &#8220;don&#8217;t mess with me, I&#8217;m a mommy and I have a whole bucket full of &#8216;time out&#8217; with your name on it.&#8221;  As in &#8220;people have scammed me before and you mess with me sucka I&#8217;m goin&#8217; to take you out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t hurt me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjlight</title>
		<link>http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>rjlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>Hey, I didn't think I was "so unhappy" at least I am making some money now. Thanks for the link though. I got scammed awhile back and that was very frustrating. I will still dream about making "real" money though. 

It's pretty pathetic that writers have to go on strike to get the compensation that they deserve. The writing carries the show, the movie, the sitcom--without good writing you have nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I didn&#8217;t think I was &#8220;so unhappy&#8221; at least I am making some money now. Thanks for the link though. I got scammed awhile back and that was very frustrating. I will still dream about making &#8220;real&#8221; money though. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty pathetic that writers have to go on strike to get the compensation that they deserve. The writing carries the show, the movie, the sitcom&#8211;without good writing you have nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhoreChurch</title>
		<link>http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>WhoreChurch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>Max,

IIRC for me electronic rights became a "standard clause" in first rights contracts I was signing back in '90 or so.  I wasn't bright enough to figure out that, while I could resell print articles beyond the first rights, the internet is forever.

I'm smarter now.  Wait, no I'm not.

I think I signed a first rights contract today that included unlimited rights on Mars.  You don't think that will come back to bite me do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max,</p>
<p>IIRC for me electronic rights became a &#8220;standard clause&#8221; in first rights contracts I was signing back in &#8216;90 or so.  I wasn&#8217;t bright enough to figure out that, while I could resell print articles beyond the first rights, the internet is forever.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m smarter now.  Wait, no I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>I think I signed a first rights contract today that included unlimited rights on Mars.  You don&#8217;t think that will come back to bite me do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>Writers for print are already in trouble because a lot of the big publishing firms and conglomerates have been forcing electronic rights into sales contracts with authors and journalists with no additional royalty or compensation for electronic reprints.  And screenwriters are still staggering from a really bad agreement made in 1988 for video sales that has never been rectified and now the entertainment conglomerates are trying to withhold royalties for electonic media of all types.  It is a bad situatiion and the conglomerates really do not care who gets hurt, they just want to win.  The only thing likely to change their stance is a change in management if shareholders and advertisers lose enough to grow concerned and force out current management for bringing things to this big a standstill.  It is not a good situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writers for print are already in trouble because a lot of the big publishing firms and conglomerates have been forcing electronic rights into sales contracts with authors and journalists with no additional royalty or compensation for electronic reprints.  And screenwriters are still staggering from a really bad agreement made in 1988 for video sales that has never been rectified and now the entertainment conglomerates are trying to withhold royalties for electonic media of all types.  It is a bad situatiion and the conglomerates really do not care who gets hurt, they just want to win.  The only thing likely to change their stance is a change in management if shareholders and advertisers lose enough to grow concerned and force out current management for bringing things to this big a standstill.  It is not a good situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhoreChurch</title>
		<link>http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>WhoreChurch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>Thanks Max.

I think we are in such a transitional time in terms of content delivery writers are going to have a tough time of it.  Let's say they get rights to a bigger share of DVD sales--DVD's are already yesterday's technology.  On demand is quickly replacing it.  But what will come next?  How long will it be before writers get a piece of that pie?

And how many of us are now self-publishing and keeping the whole pie?  That doesn't work with television/film writers, but freelancers can certainly get a bigger paycheck if they are willing to do their own marketing.

We'll see how this all shakes out.  Hopefully any new agreement will take into account content delivery methods yet to be created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Max.</p>
<p>I think we are in such a transitional time in terms of content delivery writers are going to have a tough time of it.  Let&#8217;s say they get rights to a bigger share of DVD sales&#8211;DVD&#8217;s are already yesterday&#8217;s technology.  On demand is quickly replacing it.  But what will come next?  How long will it be before writers get a piece of that pie?</p>
<p>And how many of us are now self-publishing and keeping the whole pie?  That doesn&#8217;t work with television/film writers, but freelancers can certainly get a bigger paycheck if they are willing to do their own marketing.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how this all shakes out.  Hopefully any new agreement will take into account content delivery methods yet to be created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itspeopledammit.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/why-writers-need-to-strike/#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting on this.  I have been viewing blogs -- specifically writing related blogs -- and so few of these blogs are recognizing or even talking about the strike, except to complain a bit about cancelled shows.  It is not a fun time to be a Guild writer.  [wry smile]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting on this.  I have been viewing blogs &#8212; specifically writing related blogs &#8212; and so few of these blogs are recognizing or even talking about the strike, except to complain a bit about cancelled shows.  It is not a fun time to be a Guild writer.  [wry smile]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
